Discussion about this post

User's avatar
K Tucker Andersen's avatar

100 years from now either decarbonization will be looked upon as a diversion from the real goal of sustainability or the the planet’s citizens will be approaching the poverty of the dark ages.

This interview reads like a joke .

Expand full comment
UK Lawman's avatar

Steve Clapham has produced a potentially invaluable service - explaining to private investors how the ‘energy transition’ can work in practice. I shall follow this series with interest.

In this context I found the comments by Mr Lagarrigue of KKR disappointing. The summary by Steve Clapham in his e-Mail is much clearer.

We get the points that (1) the path to ‘decarbonisation’ and use of the new technology requires a 7 year transition, (2) private capital (here KKR) will finance this. There is emphasis that there is no ‘technology risk’ for the financier,

However this does not explain how the transition works. We understand a plan is to produce buses & commercial vehicles running on battery power, but what happens during the transition, and for what purpose is KKR funding used? Decarbonisation is left vague - what does it involve? Who bears the risk and who takes profit? Profit generated by what?

Behind all this there is the risk of cost and efficacy of batteries, solar, etc, and the new background of a national grid (in USA, UK et al). Will it come, and when? Will industry accept the costs or stay with Oil & Gas for energy?

This is a fascinating subject and I hope the new BTBS podcasts will help us to understand it. More to be revealed.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts